There are some things I'd do differently, now ten years later. I might rather have conflated ergative and instrumental in part of the system, than ergative and dative. However, I might also have omitted mass as a 'number', and rather described mass nouns as having their own declension. The omission of indefinite dative makes some kind of sense - indefinite beneficients would call for a slight periphrasis. I think it's fairly likely that the indefinite plural would conflate absolutive and ergative if the indefinite singular does so - in fact, I find it more likely that the plural would do so than that the singular would.
abs erg dat instr part singular def -te -k:ı -k:ı -istik: -istik: indef -∅ -∅ -isti -isti dual def -ǎt -dəki -dnǎ -dak -dnǎ plural def -aftin -ambun -ambun -ǎmbust -ǎmbust indef -ǎ -abui -ǎbuist -ǎ mass indef -o/-e -o/-e -osti/-esti -ǎbuist -o/-e
Still, I like this system a lot even though it dropped out of Tatediem as it grew more noun-class-centered and less reliant on case. Might revive it sometime.
In many ways, playing around with a less case-centered language is pretty interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment