This is an early draft for the type of verbal morphology, changes may appear:
Subject | (Object) | (Ind. Obj) | (Voice) | TAM | STEM | subject agreement* | |
(Intensity) | Direction | (Manner) | |||||
Owner | Subject | (Direction) | (Manner) | ||||
Infinitive classifier | (Intensity) | (Argument**) |
*the subject agreement is a doubling of the subject marking that occurs with a few gender/number/etc combinations, and only in imperfective, transitive present tense verbs in the active voice.
** the type the argument correlates to is partially determined by which infinitive marker is used, the infinitive markers also partially correspond to voice markers.
Complements have no agreement on the verb (but some things that in English would be complements are indeed direct or indirect objects in Tatediem).
The Subject-(Intensity)-Direction-(Manner)-TAM-STEM form is for verbs of motion, where manner is a fixed set of specific morphemes, and direction is a set that partially overlaps with gender congruence markers, partially is related to adpositions. Owner-Subject-Direction is a form where the owner of the subject has been incorporated into the verbal marking. The infinitives are a complex issue, where the above table does not fully give an honest picture of what is going on.
I am not entirely happy with this table and want more complications.
No comments:
Post a Comment